Gun Control And The Silencing of Opposition
Written by David Risselada,
in Section Truth About Gun Control
A mass shooting in Germany, which took the lives of nine people is being blamed on an anti-immigrant, right-wing extremist. On Wednesday, February 19, the gunman launched his attack in an area well known to be inhabited by immigrants, and the first victims were of Turkish origin. This was enough for the Interior Minister of the state of Hesse to label this a mass slaughter motivated by bigotry. The shooters alleged manifesto (the fact there is a manifesto should be the first clue something is out of place) calls for the outright elimination of several African countries that all happen to be Muslim majority.
The implication being that he is an anti-Islamic, white nationalist. In America the left-wing media also attempts to blame all mass shootings on the so called racist, right-wing extremists who supposedly hate everyone who isn’t white. In the report Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment, Americans who speak out against immigrants are considered potential threats to national security. Labeling dissenters as extremists is part of a larger agenda to silence the growing opposition to the destruction of national borders and the flooding of nations with third world immigrants.
Germany has very stringent gun control laws in place. Out of a population of 80 million, two million people own nearly five and a half million guns. Police also estimate that there are over twenty million illegal guns in the country. In order to legally purchase a gun an individual must first have a justifiable reason, (self-defense is not considered justifiable) undergo a very strict background check, demonstrate knowledge of firearms satisfactory to the licensing agency and, first-time applicants under the age of twenty-five must complete a thorough psychiatric evaluation. Their gun laws were recently updated to include provisions such as home inspections of gun owners by the countries domestic intelligence agency. This was done to ensure compliance with the nations safe gun storage laws, and monitor behavior for signs of right-wing extremism.
These checks would occur every five years, and the gun owner would have to justify to the government’s satisfaction, the reason they need a firearm. This is another example of the utter and complete failure of gun control because the shooter in the February 19 killings was a licensed firearm owner. Of course, this shooting has renewed interest in the passage of stricter gun control laws.
Allegedly, gun crime rates in Germany are low compared to the rates of gun ownership. What is on the rise, however, is violent knife crime. This is a trend that is occurring all over Europe. For example, Jihadwatch.com is reporting that there are over one-hundred-twenty knife related crimes per day in France, that all can be linked to the countries immigration policies. In Germany, the number of knife related crimes has skyrocketed by over nine hundred percent in the past decade. There are over ten a day and the media does not report them, nor do the police release the names of the perpetrators.
German media do not report most knife-related violence. Crimes that are reported are often dismissed as "isolated incidents" that are unrelated to mass immigration. Moreover, many crime reports, including those in police blotters, omit references to the nationalities of the perpetrators and victims — apparently to avoid inflaming anti-immigration sentiments.... Many Germans have the sense that danger lurks everywhere, but the lack of official statistics seemingly allows German authorities to pretend that the problem is imaginary (Kern, 2019).
The U.K. is another example where up to sixty percent of the violet knife crime occurring is committed by Islamic immigrants. Britain, like Germany and France, has very restrictive gun laws but that is not keeping people safe. It is making them easy targets to violent criminals who have no regard for human life. The problem is so out of hand in London that the only solution the government can come up with is the pushing of knife control campaigns to further disarm law abiding people.
America is also under extreme pressure from massive illegal immigration. This is a trend occurring all throughout the western world and the excuse is that civilized nations must take in refugees from war torn countries and nations affected most by issues like climate change. Mass immigration is an agenda driven by the United Nations in its quest for global government. The U.N. report, “Replacement Migration: Is it a solution to declining and aging populations?” highlights the need to replace populations where there are allegedly low fertility and high mortality rates. Ironically, the United States, Britain, France and Germany are all listed as targeted nations for population replacement.
This is interesting considering the fact that many western countries are being brainwashed into believing that having children is unsustainable for the environment due to over population of the planet. Also, in these very same countries abortion is being pushed as a human rights issue. Is it possible that the western world is being programmed to de-populate itself, so that there is a need to replace populations?
Those considered to be politically conservative tend to advocate for laws that honor a nations national identity. They oppose illegal immigration and encourage assimilation into the nation’s culture. They have no problem with legal immigration, they just believe there should be some level of adopting the welcoming country’s culture and customs. According to the article Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition, conservatives suffer from mental illness because of their rigidity towards change. Political conservatism, according to Jost, Kruglanski, Glaser and Sulloway (2003) is merely an attitude developed to “reduce fear, anxiety, and uncertainty; to avoid change, disruption, and ambiguity; and to explain, order, and justify inequality among groups and individuals.” In other words, you are a racist if you oppose millions of people who have no regard for your culture but expect you to honor theirs pouring into your country.
Recent mass shooters in the United States have been labeled as white nationalists, or white supremacists. Just as it is in Germany, if the shooter doesn’t fit this description it receives very little airtime or may be swept under the rug and ignored all together. The agenda is to label all those opposed to mass immigration as being unstable, uncompassionate or potentially dangerous. Several states have passed red flag laws, with many more somewhere in the process of doing so.
Under these laws the government can remove an individual’s firearms if they have been deemed a threat to themselves or others. In this article it has been demonstrated that Germany is actively seeking to keep firearms out of the hands of people the government deems to be “right-wing extremists.” American’s that oppose illegal immigration are also considered to be extremists and conservatism as a political ideology, a mental illness. There is a definite correlation between violent crime and mass immigration, and people in western nations feel as if their livelihood and national identities are being stolen from them.
The more we speak up, the more they label us as potential terrorists. Every time they portray one of these shootings as being committed by an anti-immigrant nationalist” the more public opinion turns against rational conversations about immigration. How long is it before a political ideology can have you deemed a danger to yourself or others in the United States?